🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios launched a new playlist called Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option mirrors the standard Breakthrough setup but features a few notable changes:

• Every squad includes only eight human participants, with the remaining made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by real players grant complete experience points, while bot actions offer lower rewards.
• Only two maps are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Elements like Dogtags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

So essentially, the playlist lives up to its title: it's a casual version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think it's a good idea, as it gives additional choices for players seeking alternative methods to have fun with the title. However, if video games have taught us anything, it's that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 players are mad.

Community Reactions: From Fury to Praise

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," states one reply to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking idea," comments another. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user remarks, "I have no idea where we are going with this title," and another details all the issues they believe to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We do not require this bot mode."

However, for every complaint, some gamers explaining how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's very fun to practice, real players prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," says a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are players who actually go outside and don't play this game all the time. Allow them to strike a balance," adds another. One reply on Twitter explains that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is great for me," while someone else praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Criticisms and Player Feedback

All that said, players have constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. Some users have pointed out that it could increase wait times more extended for other modes because of the large amount of options in the game already. Similarly, some areas already encounter mostly bots in the current modes. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a required amount of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, one of the biggest complaints is that Battlefield Portal was promised to offer full XP, including AI matches, but that was removed when they tried to remove XP farming from the system. So Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base meeting them in the middle, as per a Reddit comment. A different user labels this addition as the developers "dropping the ball so hard, I had great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Occur?

If the development team has demonstrated something to date with Battlefield 6, it is that they're paying attention and responding to feedback. Tasks being too difficult were adjusted rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data shows this new playlist isn't performing to their standards, they won't be shy to make further modifications.