🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, intimidating phone calls continued. At first, supposedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a retired army general, and then from the authorities. In the end, one resident asserts he was ordered to law enforcement headquarters and warned explicitly: remain silent or experience severe repercussions.

The leather artisan is among those opposing a expensive redevelopment plan where this historic settlement – a massive informal community with rich history – will be demolished and redeveloped by a corporate giant.

"The distinctive community of the slum is unparalleled in the planet," says the resident. "Yet their intention is to eradicate our community and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The dank gullies of Dharavi sit in stark contrast to the high-rise structures and Bollywood penthouses that loom over the settlement. Dwellings are assembled randomly and frequently lacking adequate facilities, unregulated industries produce dangerous fumes and the air is saturated with the suffocating smell of open sewers.

To some, the vision of a renewed Dharavi into a developed area of high-end towers, neat parks, shiny shopping centers and residences with multiple bathrooms is a hopeful vision achieved.

"We lack proper healthcare, roads or drainage and there are no spaces for children to play," explains A Selvin Nadar, fifty-six, who relocated from southern India in 1982. "The only way is to demolish everything and provide modern residences."

Resident Opposition

However, some, such as this protester, are fighting against the plan.

All recognize that the slum, historically ignored as an illegal encroachment, is urgently needing economic input and modernization. Yet they fear that this project – without community input – could potentially turn valuable urban land into a luxury development, displacing the marginalized, immigrant populations who have resided there since generations ago.

This involved these excluded, displaced people who established the uninhabited area into a frequently examined example of local enterprise and commercial output, whose economic value is worth between a significant amount and a substantial sum per year, making it one of the world's largest unregulated sectors.

Resettlement Issues

Among approximately a million people living in the packed sprawling neighborhood, a minority will be eligible for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to finish. Others will be relocated to wastelands and salt plains on the remote edges of the city, threatening to fragment a generations-old neighborhood. A portion will be denied homes at all.

People eligible to stay in the area will be allocated units in tower blocks, a substantial change from the evolved, communal way of living and working that has sustained this area for so long.

Businesses from garment work to pottery and waste processing are likely to shrink in number and be moved to a specific "industrial sector" distant from homes.

Survival Challenge

In the case of Shaikh, a leather artisan and multi-generational resident to live in the slum, the project presents an existential threat. His informal, three-floor workshop produces apparel – formal jackets, suede trenches, decorated jackets – marketed in luxury boutiques in the city's affluent areas and abroad.

Household members dwells in the spaces underneath and employees and tailors – laborers from north India – live in the same building, permitting him to sustain operations. Away from the slum, Mumbai rents are frequently 10 times more expensive for basic accommodation.

Harassment and Intimidation

In the official facilities in the vicinity, an illustrated mock-up of the transformation initiative shows a contrasting perspective. Slickly dressed people gather on cycles and electric vehicles, acquiring western-style baked goods and croissants and having coffee on a patio outside a restaurant and dessert parlor. This depicts a stark contrast from the 20-rupee idli sambar breakfast and 5-rupee chai that sustains Dharavi's community.

"This isn't improvement for residents," states the protester. "This constitutes a massive land development that will render it impossible for us to survive."

Furthermore, there's distrust of the corporate group. Managed by an influential industrialist – among the country's wealthiest and a supporter of the government head – the corporation has encountered allegations of preferential treatment and financial impropriety, which it disputes.

Although the state government describes it as a collaborative effort, the corporation paid a significant amount for its 80% stake. Legal proceedings stating that the redevelopment was improperly granted to the corporation is pending in the top court.

Ongoing Pressure

After they started to publicly resist the development, local opponents assert they have been experienced ongoing efforts of coercion and warning – involving messages, clear intimidation and insinuations that opposing the project was comparable with speaking against the country – by individuals they claim work for the developer.

Among those accused of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c